Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John-Patrick Smith vs Brandon Walkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Walkin analysis and find out who is favored!
John-Patrick Smith vs Brandon Walkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Smith 0 - 0 Walkin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Walkin has won 41.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Walkin has won 44.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Walkin has saved 53.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Walkin winning 39.13% (W/L 9/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 174/ 143), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 18/ 19). Walkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 77/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Walkin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.5 while Walkin has played against players with an average rank of 180.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Walkin has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Walkin has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
864
Rank
108
High
35
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
825
Rank
702
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
54% (294-251)
Career Total W/L
50% (119-117)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$377,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John-Patrick Smith | Brandon Walkin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (2/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (39/54) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:21:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 147.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (177/294) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (120/177) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (48/117) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/20) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (96/283) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
John-Patrick Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
John-Patrick Smith
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
John-Patrick Smith
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Oscar Manuel Sanchez Hirales
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Walkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corey Gaal
Player
Brandon Walkin
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Brandon Walkin
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Brandon Walkin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Brandon Walkin
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
80%
(
16 of
20)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Brandon Walkin
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Brandon Walkin
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
53 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
33 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Issei Okamura
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
13
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Geni Inoue
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Smith Vs Walkin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
